Practice Levels

Revision as of 17:23, 15 June 2018 by StefiWoodward (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Keeping in mind that the goal of the project was to define “best practices” in managing seismic hazard, it is also important to realise that best practice at a mine site i...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Keeping in mind that the goal of the project was to define “best practices” in managing seismic hazard, it is also important to realise that best practice at a mine site is necessarily a function of the intensity of the seismic problem at that site. As such, it is not always necessary nor “best practice” for mines experiencing low seismic hazard to implement extensive and advanced seismological analyses. Hence low, medium and severe seismic hazard will call for different “best practices”.

To circumvent this issue, in this benchmarking report, we will refer to basic and advanced practices. Basic practices indicate approaches commonly used at most mine sites. Advanced practices involve techniques that are uncommon due to:

  • requiring personnel with a high skill base; and
  • being labour/computing/time intensive.