Home
Seismic Risk Management in underground hard rock mines is a very important and complex task. With the support of Newcrest Mining Limited (Newcrest), the Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG) undertook a survey to obtain a cross-section of the seismic risk management practices used in underground hard rock mines around the world. The survey included contributions from 16 mine sites around the world ([Participants]). The results of this survey were compiled and are made available through this website.
This website provides an overview of what is being done - it is by no means an indication of what should be done.
As our methods and our understanding of mining-induced seismicity improve, so also will our risk management practices. The content of this website will be updated in future. This is just the start!
Feel free to write us an e-mail if you would like to contribute material, share ideas or tell us about an error
[Wess] I think we can have a figure to the left here. The flowchart? where we say e-mail us, we should have a link to click that will open the e-mail - we need to create a role based email adress for this. I ther a way to span protect such an email adress on this site
Seismic Risk Management Practices
<-- end Participants]
[Page: Practice Levels -->
Keeping in mind that the goal of the project was to define “best practices” in managing seismic hazard, it is also important to realise that best practice at a mine site is necessarily a function of the intensity of the seismic problem at that site. As such, it is not always necessary nor “best practice” for mines experiencing low seismic hazard to implement extensive and advanced seismological analyses. Hence low, medium and severe seismic hazard will call for different “best practices”.
To circumvent this issue, in this benchmarking report, we will refer to basic and advanced practices. Basic practices indicate approaches commonly used at most mine sites. Advanced practices involve techniques that are uncommon due to:
- requiring personnel with a high skill base; and
- being labour/computing/time intensive.
<-- Practice Levels]
A seismic risk management process flowchart (Figure 1) has been developed and verified during the benchmarking exercise. The process has four major activities, each represented by a coloured area in the flowchart:
- Data collection (purple)
- Seismic response to mining (green)
- Control measures (blue)
- Seismic risk assessment (orange)
Within each activity, there are a number of components, represented by boxes in the flowchart. Within each box, a number of practices have been benchmarked and will be discussed in terms of being a “basic” or an “advanced” practice.
