Home: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




<div align="center">[[:File:SRMP Flowchart Download Image.png|Download SRMP Flowchart as .png Image]]</div>
<div align="center">[https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp/Downloads Download Flowchart]</div>
 
<div align="center">[https://acg.uwa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/SRMP-Flowchart.pdf Download SRMP Flowchart as A4 PDF]</div>
 


<imagemap>Image:0.00_SRMP.jpg|1000px|center
<imagemap>Image:0.00_SRMP.jpg|1000px|center
Line 33: Line 30:




Welcome to the Seismic Risk Management Process Website. This website provides a summary of Seismic Risk Management Practices in hard rock mines and was developed by the [http://www.acg.uwa.edu.au Australian Centre for Geomechanics] (ACG)  with the financial support of [http://www.newcrest.com.au Newcrest Mining Limited] (Newcrest).
<div align="center">[https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp/Downloads Download Flowchart]</div>


== About the Flowchart ==


This Seismic Risk Management Practices flowchart has been developed and verified during the benchmarking exercise. The process has four major activities, each represented by a coloured area in the flowchart:
Welcome to the Seismic Risk Management Process Website. This website provides a summary of Seismic Risk Management Practices in hard rock mines and was developed by the [http://www.acg.uwa.edu.au Australian Centre for Geomechanics] (ACG) with the financial support of [http://www.newcrest.com.au Newcrest Mining Limited] (Newcrest).
 
<li>Data collection (purple)</li>
<li>Seismic response to mining (green)</li>
<li>Control measures (blue)</li>
<li>Seismic risk assessment (orange)</li>
 
Within each activity, there are a number of components, represented by boxes in the flowchart. Within each box, a number of practices have been benchmarked and will be discussed in terms of being a “basic” or an “advanced” practice.
 
== Practice Levels ==


Keeping in mind that the goal of the project was to define “best practices” in managing seismic hazard, it is also important to realise that best practice at a mine site is necessarily a function of the intensity of the seismic problem at that site. As such, it is not always necessary nor “best practice” for mines experiencing low seismic hazard to implement extensive and advanced seismological analyses. Hence low, medium and severe seismic hazard will call for different “best practices”.


To circumvent this issue, in this benchmarking report, we will refer to basic and advanced practices. Basic practices indicate approaches commonly used at most mine sites. Advanced practices involve techniques that are uncommon due to:
<div align>[https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp/Seismic_Risk_Management_Process:About About Website]</div>


<li>requiring personnel with a high skill base; and</li>
<div align>[https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp/About_Flowchart About Flowchart]</div>
<li>being labour/computing/time intensive.</li>

Revision as of 11:38, 14 November 2018

INTERACTIVE FLOWCHART
Click the headings and subheadings of the flowchart that you'd like to visit.


Download Flowchart
This flowchart and all variations of this flowchart are the copyright of the Australian Centre for Geomechanics
© 2018, Australian Centre for Geomechanics


Download Flowchart


Welcome to the Seismic Risk Management Process Website. This website provides a summary of Seismic Risk Management Practices in hard rock mines and was developed by the Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG) with the financial support of Newcrest Mining Limited (Newcrest).


About Website
About Flowchart